Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 605 | Total Threads: 50,801 | Total Posts: 518,375 Currently Active Users: 709 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, ian66 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
28-06-2006, 05:30 PM | #1 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burton on Trent
Bike: M900
Posts: 244
|
Monster or not??
Hi everybody,
I'm after some advice please, to help me decide about Monsters as a possible purchase (this may be akin to asking Sweeney Todd his view on pies!) I've never owned a "modern" bike, and currently ride a 612cc R.E. Bullet cafe-racer (110mph, torquey mid-range, drum brakes, slow-steering but very predictable handling) and a 1986 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario (120+mph, 4-valve heads so very torquey, shaft drive, linked disc brakes which I like, stupid 16" wheels that make it rather twitchy over bumps). Both of these bikes have smallish handlebar fairings and get ridden "enthusiastically" all year round. I want a smallish, lightish bike that will have significantly better suspension & handling than either of the above, radial tyres (wow!), and a bit more performance combined with decent reliability. I don't want a faired sportsbike, and have come to consider a Monster 750 or 900. however, I've noticed that most advertised Monsters and other Ducatis seem to have done only about 2,000 miles a year: are they unreliable if used more than that? are they basically just for poseurs in summer weather? All constructive advice will be very welcome - many thanks! |
|
|