Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 673 | Total Threads: 50,934 | Total Posts: 519,366 Currently Active Users: 1,172 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, Mozzer46 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
17-05-2006, 10:07 PM | #16 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
It still gets rusty though, well it has on mine, thats next winters project to sort out!! |
|
18-05-2006, 07:47 AM | #17 |
Too much time on my hands member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stonehouse, Glos
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,085
|
It still isn't stainless, that's true!
|
18-05-2006, 08:23 AM | #18 | |
1/2 man - 1/2 pogo-stick
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dartford, Kent
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 7,241
|
Quote:
I have had a 95 plate 600 & 900ie dark (solo & trike), and the injected bike is a BIG improvement, especially in winter when carb icing rears it's ugly head IMO if you can afford the extra for both the bike & insurance (although there shouldn't be much in it if you shop around) then get a 620. You don't mention if you've passed your test, or how long you have held a full bike licence. Bear in mind the monster will have to be resricted to 33bhp if you've held your licence for less than 2 years.
__________________
GT Fully paid up member of the S.A.S. (Scottoiler Appreciation Society) 27,000 miles on original chain - and still going strong! |
|
18-05-2006, 01:01 PM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Don't panic, seasoned pro, restriction ends soon ish....... ;-)
|
21-05-2006, 10:35 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hehe another question. I went to Jorden bikes in Leeds yesterday and had a look and a sit on a 2002 620ie in yellow(liking the yellow). Alot bigger than i expected to be honest. So im guessing the m600 and m620 are the same size right? (physically) I'd almost written the idea off aswell, i fear 30 secs of sitting will cost me 500 quid more haha. Also are there any styling differences you lot know of appart from the clocks.....? Thanks again Luke
|
21-05-2006, 10:40 PM | #21 |
Fanactical volunteer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kent
Bike: M900
Posts: 9,034
|
The 620 is a bit taller than the 600 cos newer frame of the st. It also rides different and generally seems to turn in quicker. Much nicer IMHO due to frame
__________________
http://albies93m900.blogspot.co.uk/ |
21-05-2006, 11:08 PM | #22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's not the size that's important...
(Snarf, snarf)
In reality I haven't noticed much difference in performance between my old TRX and my shiny 620ie until I get to about 90-100. After 100 it runs out of steam but will sort of edge up to about 115 or so eventually. Because I'm a dull old git I rarely want to be much quicker than that, especially as I do most of my miles inside the M25. From all I've read the injection model is much easier to live with than the carb model, and the extra power of a 620 over an old 600 is well worth having. I personally would prefer a slightly higher seat height, even though I'm a shortarsed 5'6", but I've seen lots of tall people grinning from ear to ear, so I guess it's what you get used to. My little monsterette is more fun than a bag of snakes. Go for it. Jes |
|
|