UK Monster Owners Club Forum » .: UKMOC Bike Reviews :. » Bike Reviews » Press Launch of the New Monster 797

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-2017, 03:19 PM   #1
LTDUK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Uncle Bob,

Since the 797 has an engine that was developed from the 796, it would be more appropriate to compare it to the 796 rather than 696.

The price of a 797 in red is £7,895. A 796 with ABS was £7,695 in 2010, after UK inflation has been applied from 2010 to 2017, that £7,695 in 2010 which would have bought you a 796 is £9,476 today, so the 797 after being adjusted for inflation is less expensive.

From the same size engine, after having to pass stricter European emissions (now Euro 4), the 797 makes a claimed 75bhp, when we claimed 78bhp with the 796.

With the 796 we claimed a kerb weight of 188kg, with the 797 we claim a kerb weight of 193kg.

The 797 is equipped with a daytime running light, a USB charging port under the seat and ABS as standard.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2017, 03:46 PM   #2
Uncle Bob
Registered User
 
Uncle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Milton Keynes
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTDUK View Post
Hi Uncle Bob,

Since the 797 has an engine that was developed from the 796, it would be more appropriate to compare it to the 796 rather than 696.

The price of a 797 in red is £7,895. A 796 with ABS was £7,695 in 2010, after UK inflation has been applied from 2010 to 2017, that £7,695 in 2010 which would have bought you a 796 is £9,476 today, so the 797 after being adjusted for inflation is less expensive.

From the same size engine, after having to pass stricter European emissions (now Euro 4), the 797 makes a claimed 75bhp, when we claimed 78bhp with the 796.

With the 796 we claimed a kerb weight of 188kg, with the 797 we claim a kerb weight of 193kg.

The 797 is equipped with a daytime running light, a USB charging port under the seat and ABS as standard.
Hello there LTDUK,

I'm calling 696 because of the styling and power output rather than what the engine was developed on. Either way, do you think a 'new rider' at which this bike is being aimed is going to know all that stuff?

And, all that being said, the fact remains that said 'new rider' can go and buy a better equipped, lighter, more powerful (albeit negligible) low mileage 696 for about half the price, so I'm curious about why they wouldn't just go and do that? And that's also assuming they want a Ducati and not a Yamaha or a Triumph (for example).

Obviously as a Ducati owner, and fan, I hope the bike does well
Uncle Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2017, 06:57 PM   #3
Dirty
Bockloks
 
Dirty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London
Bike: No Bike Yet!
Posts: 4,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bob View Post
And, all that being said, the fact remains that said 'new rider' can go and buy a better equipped, lighter, more powerful (albeit negligible) low mileage 696 for about half the price, so I'm curious about why they wouldn't just go and do that? And that's also assuming they want a Ducati and not a Yamaha or a Triumph (for example).
Cos those bikes are rubbish and this is a Ducati. I think it's pretty cheap considering.

Not for me but likewise hope it does well
__________________
Wounds heal, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever


Dirty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 AM.

vBulletin Skins by vBmode.com. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.