 |
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |  |
|
 |
|
||||
 |
 |
Registered
Members: 676 | Total Threads: 50,953 | Total Posts: 519,521 Currently Active Users: 2,412 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, Humph |
 |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Today, 03:49 PM
|
#1 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 518
|
Rear brake reduction
OK has anyone out there any experience/expertise to share, re going for a 220mm dia rear disc instead of the std 245mm as fitted to what was a 94 M900. My thinking is that 245 is probably larger than necessary, but would 220 be too pathetic?
Just did a comparison on the scales, 425gms saving of unsprung rotating mass does sound good to me.
__________________
Bitza Last edited by Bitza; Today at 03:54 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode