![]() |
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registered
Members: 637 | Total Threads: 50,828 | Total Posts: 518,550 Currently Active Users: 934 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, Snakedog |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Glasgow
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 258
|
![]() Apologies if this has been kicked around before but I’m interested in learning the views of you knowledgeable people……I am fortunate to have 3 modernish bikes, 2 Triumphs (1050st & T100 Bonnie) both have cable clutches and perform well with no noticeable “heaviness “…..my Evo has a hydraulic action. My mates new Hypermotard is hydraulic but another pal has a modern Supersport, which I think has a similar engine to the Hypermotard, the clutch on the SS is cable. Today I joined a pal on his brand new GSX”S”…..1000cc supernaked…..with a cable clutch.
To my nonengineering brain it would appear that cable should be cheaper to fit….so what advantage does hydraulic have on a motorcycle application ? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|