UK Monster Owners Club Forum » .: Wanted and Offered :. » I want! » Monster 900 bottom yoke wanted

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2020, 08:52 AM   #1
Davektm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Monster 900 bottom yoke wanted

I’m looking for a 900 Monster bottom yoke For my 98 monster if anyone has one they want to sell.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 10:08 AM   #2
Albie
Fanactical volunteer
 
Albie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kent
Bike: M900
Posts: 9,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davektm View Post
I’m looking for a 900 Monster bottom yoke For my 98 monster if anyone has one they want to sell.
I had a mint one for sale for 3 years. Couldnt sell it for love or money. Sold last week for £15.to a European buyer. Vapour blasted and replate fittings too. I'm sure there are more out there but not as good condition.
Albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 11:21 AM   #3
chris.p
Gold Member
 
chris.p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln
Bike: No Bike Yet!
Posts: 876
Is there any difference between 600 to 900 monster??
chris.p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 11:32 AM   #4
Dukedesmo
Registered User
 
Dukedesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leics
Bike: M900
Posts: 2,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris.p View Post
Is there any difference between 600 to 900 monster??
As with the frames, AFAIK they are all the same?
__________________
M900, 916, LeMans II.

Dukedesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 11:40 AM   #5
Nasher
Registered User
 
Nasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,518
Not sure if the one I have hanging around is 900SS or M900.
Will have a look later.

Nasher.
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over.
Nasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 11:48 AM   #6
chris.p
Gold Member
 
chris.p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln
Bike: No Bike Yet!
Posts: 876
I have this one on Ebay https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254638780994
chris.p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 11:54 AM   #7
Nasher
Registered User
 
Nasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,518
Chris.P

Just looked at your ebay ad.
I'm convinced the SS and Monster ones are different.

Will have to have a look in the garage shortly.

EDIT
Maybe not, my M900 and 900SS ones look the same.
Not sure about the geometry though.
Worth checking the Stein Dinse website to see if the part numbers are the same.

Nasher.
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over.

Last edited by Nasher; 09-07-2020 at 12:00 PM..
Nasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 12:04 PM   #8
Dukedesmo
Registered User
 
Dukedesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leics
Bike: M900
Posts: 2,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nasher View Post
I'm convinced the SS and Monster ones are different.
I maybe wrong but I think the offset is different?

IIRC, Monster has smaller offset (25mm vs 30mm?) making it more 'flickable'/less stable...
__________________
M900, 916, LeMans II.


Last edited by Dukedesmo; 09-07-2020 at 12:14 PM..
Dukedesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 12:12 PM   #9
chris.p
Gold Member
 
chris.p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln
Bike: No Bike Yet!
Posts: 876
If you check the part number on the picture it is for a monster I believe, but we used monster or SS for the DD race bikes

Last edited by chris.p; 09-07-2020 at 12:14 PM..
chris.p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 12:21 PM   #10
Nasher
Registered User
 
Nasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukedesmo View Post
I maybe wrong but I think the offset is different?

IIRC, Monster has smaller offset (25mm vs 30mm?) making it more 'flickable'/less stable...
Just had another look and the above is correct.

Definitely less offset on the Monster by about that amount.

And the spare one I have is SS.

Nasher.
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over.
Nasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 01:04 PM   #11
Albie
Fanactical volunteer
 
Albie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kent
Bike: M900
Posts: 9,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nasher View Post
Chris.P

Just looked at your ebay ad.
I'm convinced the SS and Monster ones are different.

Will have to have a look in the garage shortly.

EDIT
Maybe not, my M900 and 900SS ones look the same.
Not sure about the geometry though.
Worth checking the Stein Dinse website to see if the part numbers are the same.

Nasher.
They are but minimal. It's just offset. Height width and bores the same. It's a gamble but not a huge one.

Part number s are different but castings say not.
Albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 02:08 PM   #12
Mr Gazza
Lord of the Rings
 
Mr Gazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Norwich
Bike: M900sie
Posts: 5,984
I just pushed a Monster top yoke over the protruding leg tops on my SS. The stem nut does not register correctly, so there is approximately 5mm difference in the offsets.

So SS bottom yoke is not compatible with Monster top, but you could use a pair with due regard for the different trail (except you would then have no handlebar clamps!)

Quite good that this has been brought up as I had assumed they were the same and plan to fit Monster yokes to the SS, so now I know I need to address the trail.

I'm not entirely sure but I think the stems could be different lengths too, as the nut is proud on a Monster and flush, if not recessed a bit on the SS.

__________________

Last edited by Mr Gazza; 09-07-2020 at 02:10 PM..
Mr Gazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 02:36 PM   #13
Darkness
.
 
Darkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stockbridge
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,984
Would I be right in thinking the Monster yokes have the fork legs approx. 5mm closer to the steering head, so the trail of the front wheel is increased by 5mm too?

By “Front Wheel Trail” I’m meaning the horizontal distance on the ground between the centre of the tyre contact patch and the intersection with a projected line of the steering head axis.

It would be interesting to compare that change with the magnitude of increase/decrease in front wheel trail when you raise or lower the forks in the yokes or adjust the height of the rose joints in the rear suspension wishbone/tierod? Of course dropping the front, or jacking up the back end affects caster angle, wheelbase and other aspects too.

That could be how the racers try to get the Monster back to 888 and SS geometry.
__________________
Original and Best since 1993

Last edited by Darkness; 09-07-2020 at 02:39 PM..
Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 02:44 PM   #14
Dukedesmo
Registered User
 
Dukedesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leics
Bike: M900
Posts: 2,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness View Post

That could be why the racers try to get the Monster back to 888 and SS geometry.
I don't claim to be an expert in suspension but my 916 has 30mm (I think) offset, same as 900SS, 888 etc. and probably all the racers?

It has to be said that the steering is far more stable/less twitchy than the Monster (realise there's more to it than just the offset) and for a more extreme example, my old Guzzi has around 60mm offset, along with more raked out forks and that's as stable as a freight train - I have no idea why it's even got a steering damper!!
__________________
M900, 916, LeMans II.

Dukedesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2020, 04:55 PM   #15
Mr Gazza
Lord of the Rings
 
Mr Gazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Norwich
Bike: M900sie
Posts: 5,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness View Post
Would I be right in thinking the Monster yokes have the fork legs approx. 5mm closer to the steering head, so the trail of the front wheel is increased by 5mm too?

By “Front Wheel Trail” I’m meaning the horizontal distance on the ground between the centre of the tyre contact patch and the intersection with a projected line of the steering head axis.

It would be interesting to compare that change with the magnitude of increase/decrease in front wheel trail when you raise or lower the forks in the yokes or adjust the height of the rose joints in the rear suspension wishbone/tierod? Of course dropping the front, or jacking up the back end affects caster angle, wheelbase and other aspects too.

That could be how the racers try to get the Monster back to 888 and SS geometry.
You fairly well echo my thoughts as I walked away from SS after the little try on.

The SS fork legs protrude from the top yoke by about 50/60mm and the clip ons, fit above the yoke.

I had thought that when I do the swap to monster yokes that bringing the bike up on the legs (less leg above the yoke) would slow the steering right down, by increasing the trail/castor, but now I have discovered the offset difference I am hoping that it will come back to close to either the original SS geometry or the Monster's.
Since I don't know any of the specifics of the geometry of either bikes without measuring carefully, this is all hopeful speculation.
I doubt they differ very much, but get there in different ways.
Since I will be hacking the rear right off the SS and adding different suspension, I do have the option of tuning it via rear ride height. It will need some careful sums, a little educated guesswork and then the building in of some adjustability in the ride height. Adjustable shocks being the easiest solution I think.
I daresay it will take a few test rides to get it right, but I shouldn't be too far out if I stay somewhere near the SS and Monster geometry.
__________________
Mr Gazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 AM.

vBulletin Skins by vBmode.com. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.