Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 676 | Total Threads: 50,944 | Total Posts: 519,457 Currently Active Users: 807 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, Humph |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
23-05-2024, 03:31 PM | #1 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burton on Trent
Bike: M900
Posts: 250
|
An unexpected comparison
For many years I’ve done an annual tour around N. Spain & Portugal on my M900, but last year and just recently I used my ST4 (916) for improved comfort.
Last year, almost 2,000 miles, and I had to add over half a litre of my usual Fuchs Silkolene fully synthetic 10/40 oil, plus a bit more after returning home. This year, same mileage and type of riding, but on same brand’s semi-synthetic 10/40: no top-ups needed at all. Maybe I’ll switch the Monster to the semi/synthetic oil as well - it is cheaper, especially if it’s not consumed!
__________________
Owning a Monsta is not the beginning of the end, but it may well be the end of the beginning.... |
23-05-2024, 05:03 PM | #2 |
.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: East London
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 9,736
|
ST4 will likely run closer engine tolerances, being a water boiler, which may go some way to explaining the lower consumption.
|
25-05-2024, 08:55 AM | #3 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burton on Trent
Bike: M900
Posts: 250
|
No, my comparison is for the ST4 on both trips, only the oil changed.
__________________
Owning a Monsta is not the beginning of the end, but it may well be the end of the beginning.... |
|
|